Sunday, February 27, 2011

SBY, Don't Wait For A Third Bullet

(published by The Jakarta Post on 1 Mar 2011. Click here)

President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono (SBY) should take some advice from Winston Churchill: “In war, you can only be killed once, but in politics, many times.”

One bullet is enough,” are the right words for SBY to consider in relation to his party’s losses in the Bank Century bailout case last year. The battle itself, where the lawmakers in the House of Representative voted to determine whether the government’s decision to bail out the bank was right or wrong was truly absurd. How can something deemed as the truth be a matter of a vote? They fought for a belief and spent a lot of time and money doing so, and then the outcome was nothing.

Today, everything is clear. After the House banged its gavel and stated that the government was wrong in its handling of the Bank Century bailout, so what? The noisy debate was only a reflection of their arrogance, and it was like they were asserting “who is more powerful than us?”. The winner of the vote was bestowed with Sri Mulyani’s departure to the World Bank, and nothing else.

And now that case seems to have evaporated. Last week, another bullet grazed SBY when the House again aimed at him with the tax graft inquiry proposal. Luckily, it ended in a failure, with 266-264 voting in his favor, after the Great Indonesia Movement Party (Gerindra) jumped onto the coalition wagon.

We would understand if today we were surrounded by news about the possibility of SBY axing the Golkar Party and Prosperous Justice Party (PKS) from the coalition. Such a move would not just be understandable, but imperative. These two parties have so far demonstrated very confusing movements in the eyes of the public. While we agree that coalition members should not always blindly support every government decision, what the two parties have been doing so far is confusing and unethical. This is not about which one is good and which is bad. This is about political trickery and we have become exhausted with such things. This is not creating a healthy democratic environment. If they want to be opposition parties, why do they keep brooding on the pond and enjoying seats in Cabinet? The people’s logical questions are as simple as that. “If they no longer feel at home, they can voluntarily leave and stay out of government,” a Democratic Party executive said.

We cannot trust such statements as, “While we are in the coalition, we should remain critical of the government because this is a people’s mandate” — as such parties often say. The PKS president said at the end of the three-day meeting in Yogyakarta on Saturday, Feb. 26, that the move should be seen as an implementation of the political contract to create good and clean government. Hmm, true or not? Let people judge.

Political analysts said SBY did not have the courage to expel Golkar considering the party’s power. But one thing is for sure: Golkar would be trembling if they were not in power. Can we remember when a Golkar executive said Golkar was not accustomed to being an opposition party, days after they lost in Presidential election?

We, the people, also see a lot of messiness in the government’s work, and should keep control of it, but we cannot avoid having suspicion that every move the two parties make is undermined by a hidden agenda for further political bargaining. “To uphold the truth and create clean government” is what lawmakers should be aiming at.

Now SBY needs to act quickly to take brave measures and kick these two parties out. Otherwise, they (especially Golkar) will become so conceited that they will fire a third bullet.

***
Serpong, Feb 27, 2011
Titus J.

Sunday, February 13, 2011

RI's Transition No Model for Egypt

(published by The Jakarta Post on 18 Feb 2011. Click here)


After the resignation of Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak on Feb. 11, Egyptians need to realize that the path to democracy that they have dreamed about for so long is still a long journey. If they are expecting democracy immediately after successfully toppling their president, who was in power for 30 years, they will very soon be disappointed.

Mubarak is gone. The people are joyous and euphoric after their victory, but beware! That was just one day. There are hundreds and even thousands of days in the future. Egyptians should move forward but there is no toll road to a democratic destiny. We know that exchanging authoritarian rule with democratic rule is about dealing with chronic illness, and it is painful and everyone needs to understand this.

All the media in the world had headlines about Mubarak’s resignation, underlining the word “freedom”. On Feb. 11, after Vice President Omar Suleiman announced that Mubarak had decided to step down, the media reported Egyptians of all ages jamming the banks of the Nile and the squares of Cairo waving flags, lighting fireworks and shouting “freedom”.

Is that freedom from Hosni Mubarak, or freedom from what?


We, Indonesians, have experienced our country’s transition to democracy. We have had a taste of freedom (from Suharto’s authoritarian rule), but, after more than twelve years, the question remains: “Is democracy in our country true freedom and prosperity for the people?” This is only one question. We still have plenty of questions about whether we have true freedom in the context of religion, human rights, minority protection, law enforcement, bribery, corruption, poverty etc.

Many political analysts compare what’s happening in Egypt with what happened in Indonesia in 1998. Even in the United States the Obama administration used Indonesia as a model for Egypt’s transition. President Obama in a speech on Friday, Feb. 11, compared Egypt’s revolution to Indonesia’s. This is logical because the two countries were very similar in the process of regime substitution.

But, the world should not stop with the revolution and transition similarities. The world should also notice that Indonesia’s journey to democracy has almost failed because democracy in Indonesia has gone too far. Democracy in Indonesia has veered from idealism and, unfortunately, has resulted in a weak government. This weak government has dragged Indonesia into its leadership crisis today.

Several cases, from the Gayus saga to the Ahmadiyah attack in Pandeglang, Banten, to the vandalism of churches in Temanggung, Central Java, recently have shown us that this country is run without strong leadership. Is this democracy? A democracy where people can persecute others freely and the government seems too afraid to take stern action against organized attackers?

erhaps the Egyptians have learned from Indonesia in fighting against dictatorship, but they should also learn how to guard the process of a democratic transition, including how to form not only a democratic government but a strong government. Otherwise, they will follow Indonesia and become a failing nation.

***
Serpong, Feb 13, 2011
Titus J.

Colin Powell Who Firmed About His Calling

General Colin Powell was not only a successful military soldier, but also politician, diplomat, and statesman. In the 1995s, he was a pres...