Skip to main content

Andrew Jackson Was Born For a Storm

Andrew Jackson was a controversial figure in American history.

Elected as seventh president in 1829 and reelected for the 2nd term until 1837, he was marked by both democratic triumphs and racist tragedies during his presidency.


Jackson expanded the powers of the presidency in ways that none of his six predecessors had. He was the first president to come from the common people, not from an educated elite. He was the first to build what was recognized as a political party. He was also the first to maintain a large circle of private advisers –what was called his Kitchen Cabinet-- to help him make policy.


During his presidency, he showed him as the most contradictory of men. He brought America into a country that professed a love of democracy but on the other hand created society to live with inequality that was prone to racism and intolerance.


Jackson was a sentimental man who rescued an Indian orphan on a battlefield to raise in his home, however he was also the president responsible for the removal of Indian tribes from their ancestral lands.


In terms of life-career path, Jackson had completed track. Born as a son of Scots-Irish immigrants, he became a practicing lawyer, a public prosecutor, a U.S attorney, a delegate to the founding Tennessee Constitutional Convention, a U.S congressman, a U.S senator, a judge of the state Superior Court, and a major general.


He was the hero when he defeated the British at New Orleans in 1815, the victory that transformed him into a fabled figure, and finally brought him to the White House.


This book writes the long journey of Jackson whose portrait marks the current $20 US Dollar banknote.


“I was born for a storm,” Jackson once said, “and a calm does not suit me.” This was to prove what kind of character he had. He liked to live in an arena despite it being rough and tiring. Yes, he was an American lion.


***

Serpong, 10 Jan 2026

Titus J.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Bertrand Russell Critical Analysis on Western Philosophy

“Philosophy is something intermediate between theology and science,” said Bertrand Russell. Theology and science occupy their own territory. All definite knowledge belongs to science, all dogma as to what surpasses definite knowledge belongs to theology. Between theology and science there is No Man’s Land, exposed to attack from both sides. For that the philosophy is present. The No Man’s Land is philosophy. Then he added, “Philosophical conceptions are a product of two factors: one, inherited religious and ethical conceptions; the other, the sort of investigation which may be called ‘scientific’.” Bertrand Russell who was born in 1872, he himself was a British philosopher as well as mathematician, logician, historian, writer, and social critic. In this book, which was firstly published in 1945, Russell divided the philosophy chronologically into three parts: Ancient Philosophy, Catholic Philosophy and Modern Philosophy. This book is a widely read and influential philosophical history ...

Eisenhower, The Top Figure Army General, The Modest President

This is a portrait of Dwight D. Eisenhower, a young dreamer, charting a course from Abilene, Kansas, to West Point and beyond. Before becoming the 34th president (two terms from 1953 to 1961), Ike –as he was called–  was a five-star general in the U.S. Army during World War II and served as Supreme Commander of the Allied Expeditionary Force in Europe. This book reveals the journey of the man who worked with incredible subtlety to move events in the direction he wished them to go. In both war and peace, he gave the world confidence in American leadership. In the war period, Ike commanded the largest multinational force ever assembled to fight German troops in leading the Western powers to victory.  During his presidency, he ended a three-year war in Korea with honor and dignity. Not a single American died in combat for the next eight years. He resisted calls for preventive war against the Soviet Union and China, faced down Khruschev over Berlin, and restored stability in Leban...

Perhentian Ahok di KM 19.4

Ketika angka quick count hasil perolehan suara Pilkada Jakarta 19 April yang lalu menunjukkan 42 persen untuk Ahok-Djarot dan 58 persen untuk Anies-Sandi, banyak yang terkesima, sedih, dan tak sedikit yang menangis. Herannya, yang menangis bukan hanya orang Jakarta, tetapi juga mereka yang tinggal di luar Jakarta, bahkan luar negeri. Media sosial riuh-rendah dengan komentar, seolah tak percaya dengan angka yang terpampang di televisi dan berseliweran melalui WhatsApp group. Di saat itulah tiba-tiba kita merasakan ada sesuatu yang hilang - sesuatu yang pernah kita miliki, yang pernah mewarnai denyut kehidupan kita walau hanya lewat surat kabar dan media sosial, dan sesuatu yang selalu kita rasakan kehadirannya walaupun jarak memisahkan. Kita – bukan cuma orang Jakarta tetapi siapapun yang selama empat tahunan ini menyemai harapan dan optimisme, tiba-tiba secara bersamaan membisikkan tanya, “Bagaimana rupa Jakarta nanti tanpa Ahok?” Tanggal 19 April itu seperti satu titik di ...